Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of varicose disease with endovasal laser obliteration and short stripping

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes (within six months) after short stripping (SS) and endovenous laser obliteration (EVLO) in patients with varicose veins when analyzing ultrasound findings, postoperative complications, level of postoperative pain, clinical manifestations, and duration of rehabilitation after the intervention. Patients with varicose veins of lower extremities and insufficiency of large saphenous vein valves had either EVLO or SS with miniflebectomy. All patients were examined before surgery and then in 5 days, 10 days and in 1, 3 and 6 months after it. The patients also had clinical examination, ultrasound duplex scanning of their lower extremity veins; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) was also used for the trial. Pain was assessed during the first 10 days after the surgery using a 10-point pain assessment scale. 156 patients (177 lower extremities) were followed-up for 6 months. As the results of our study showed, endovenous laser obliteration and short stripping were equally effective in eliminating the reflux of the great saphenous vein (GSV). After 6 months of follow-up, the reflux along the medial inflow was noted in one case in SS group; partial GSV recanalization was noted in one case in EVLO group in 3 months, in 3 cases – in 6 months. Besides, despite LMH preventive doses one patient from EVLO group had EHIT II deep vein thrombosis. The obtained outcomes have demonstrated that EVLO and SS have similar effectiveness and safety. No difference has been found between these two types of treatment, except more pronounced postoperative pain and bruising in SS group. Performed care was equally safe and effective in eliminating GSV reflux, in relieving symptoms and eliminating varicose veins as well as in improving the quality of life. Long-term outcomes, especially the rate of relapses depending on the type of intervention, are to be investigated in future trials.

1. Pokrovsky A.V., Bogatov Y.P. The state of vascular surgery in the Russian Federation in 2018. Angiologia i sosudistaya chirugia. 2019; 25 (2): 31–40. [In Russ.]

2. Diagnostics and treatment of chronic venous disease: Guidelines of Russian Phlebological Association. Flebologiya. 2018; 12 (3): 146–240. [In Russ.]

3. Lawson J.A., Gauw S.A., van Vlijmen C.J., et al. Prospective comparative cohort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using radiofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018; 6 (1): 31–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.06.016

4. Rasmussen L.H., Lawaetz M., Bjoern L., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011; 98 (8): 1079–1087. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7555

5. Nesbitt C., Bedenis R., Bhattacharya V., Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (7): CD005624. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3

6. Musaev M.M., Ananyeva M.V., Girсiashvili A.G., Gavrilenko A.V. Endovenous obliteration in the combined treatment of chronic venous diseases. Laser Medicine. 2020; 24 (1):45-48. DOI: 10.37895/2071-8004-2020-24-1-45-48 [In Russ.]

7. Gavrilenko A.V., Vakhratyan P.E., Kotaev A.Yu., et al. Saving and radical principles in the surgical treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Phlebologia. 2018; 12 (4): 300–305. [In Russ.]

8. Nicolaides A., Kakkos S., Eklof B., et al. Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs – guidelines according to scientific evidence. Int Angiol. 2014; 33 (2): 87–208.

9. Duvanskiy V.A., Azizov G.A. Features of regional microcirculation in patients with chronic venous insufficiency, stage C6. Lazernaya medicina. 2011; 15 (1): 12–15. [In Russ.]

10. Sadek M., Kabnick L., Rockman C., et al. Increasing ablation distance peripheral to the saphenofemoral junction may result in a diminished rate of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013; 1 (3): 257-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.01.002

11. Rautio T., Ohinmaa A., Perala J., et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: A randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35 (3): 958–965. DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.123096

12. Lurie F., Creton D., Eklof B., et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg. 2003; 38 (2): 207–214. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00228-3

13. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): Two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005; 29 (1): 67–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.019

14. Hinchcliff R.J., Ubhi J., Beech A., et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006; 31 (2): 212–218. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.07.005

15. Medeiros C.A.F., Luccas G.C. Comparison of endovenous treatment with an 810 nm laser versus conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein in patients with primary varicose veins. Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31 (12): 1685–1694. DOI: 10.2310/6350.2005.31309

16. Rasmussen L.H., Bjoern L., Lawaetz M., et al. Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: Short-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 46 (2): 308–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.053

17. Wright D., Gobin J.P., Bradbury A.V., et al. Varisolve polidocanol microfoam compared with surgery or sclerotherapy in the management of varicose veins in the presence of trunk vein incompetence: European randomized controlled trial. Phlebology. 2006; 21 (4): 180–190. DOI: 10.1258/026835506779115807

18. Bountouroglou D.G., Azzam M., Kakkos S.K., et al. Ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy combined with saphenofemoral ligation compared to surgical treatment of varicose veins: Early results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006; 31 (2): 93–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.08.024

19. Proebstle T.M., Moehler T., Herdemann S. Reduced recanalization rates of the great saphenous vein after endovenous EVL treatment with increased energy dosing: Definition of a threshold for the endovenous fluence equivalent. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44 (4): 834–839. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.05.052