Preview

Laser Medicine

Advanced search

Modern methods for treating pilonidal disease: a comparative study

https://doi.org/10.37895/2071-8004-2024-28-2-34-40

Abstract

Purpose. To make a comparative analysis of the effi ciency of surgical treatment of pilonidal disease with traditional excision and laser destruction.

Materials and methods. 368 patients with pilonidal disease who underwent surgical treatment between 2018 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into three groups. In Group 1 (n = 112), a cyst was excised, and the wound was tightly sutured with Donatti sutures. In Group 2 (n = 123), patients had Cleft Lift surgery (Bascom II surgery). Group 3 (n = 133) included patients after the combined laser treatment.

Results. The combined laser technique for surgical treatment of pilonidal disease has a statistically signifi cant advantage over traditional surgical methods in terms of surgical time, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, disability period, healing process, frequency of postoperative complications, and frequency of disease relapses.

Conclusions. The technique of laser destruction and thermoobliteration of coccyx cysts is universal and easy for application, highly effective, provides high quality of life for patients, and can be used routinely in an outpatient setting.

About the Authors

M. Yu. Cherepenin
Elena Malysheva Medical Center LLC
Russian Federation

Mikhail Yu. Cherepenin – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Chief Physician

Moscow



I. V. Lutkov
Elena Malysheva Medical Center LLC
Russian Federation

Ivan V. Lutkov – Cand. Sci. (Med.), coloproctologist

Moscow



V. A. Gorsky
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Viktor A. Gorsky – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor at Department of Experimental and Clinical Surgery

Moscow



References

1. Khubezov D.A., Puchkov D.K., Serebryansky P.V., Luka nin R.V., Ogoreltsev A.Y., Krotkov A.R., Ignatov I.S. Surgical treatment of pilonidal desease (review). Koloproktologia. 2018; (4): 79–88 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-4-79-88

2. Søndenaa, K. Infl uence of failure of primary wound healing on subsequent recurrence of pilonidal sinus. Combined prospective study and randomised controlled trial / K.Søndenaa et al. European Journal of Surgery. 2002; 168(11): 614–618.

3. Bascom, J. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures / J. Bascom, T. Bascom. Archives of Surgery. 2002; 137(10): 1146–1150.

4. Frederico Bonito, Diogo Cerejeira João Goulão, José de Assunção Gonçalves. A Retrospective Study of the Safety and Effi cacy of a Radial Diode Laser Probe in the Management of Pilonidal Sinus Disease. Dermatologic Surgery Publish Ahead of Print. May 2021; (9). DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003080

5. Cenk Ersavas, Basak Erginel, Feryal Gun Soysal. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Video surgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques. January 2022; 18(1). DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.124206

6. Barış Gülcü, Ersin Ozturk. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs. laser-assisted endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: short-term results from a retrospective case-matched study. Techniques in Coloproctology. January 2022; 26(4). DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02568-8

7. Mustafa Dönmez, Murat Uludag. Evaluation of the Early Outcomes of Laser-Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Combination and Comparison With the Combination of CauteryPhenol-Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment. Cureus. 2022 Jul 17; 14(7): e26948. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26948

8. Shakhrai S.V., Cherepenin M.Yu., Gain M.Yu., Gorskiy V.A., Gain Yu.M. Laser minimally invasive technologies for pilonidal disease. Koloproktologia. 2022; 21(3): 92–98 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-92-98

9. Denisenko V.L. Analysis of the use of laser technologies for pilonidal disease. Koloproktologia. 2022; 21(3): 27–32 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-27-32

10. Michael Williams, Gwynneth A Sullivan, Neha Nimmagadda, Brian C Gulack. Laser Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Pilot Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum Publish Ahead of Print (5). March 2023. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002745

11. Henrik Nuutinen, Elina Savikkomaa, Emmi Tyrväinen, Heidi Myllykangas. Laser Treatment of Pilonidal Disease – Immediate and Mid-term Results. Indian Journal of Surgery. May 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-023-03802-3

12. Marjolein De Decker, Toon Sels, Sander Van Hoof. Does minimally invasive laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease live up to its expectations: a multi-center study with 226 patients. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. February 2023; 38(1). DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04324-w

13. Khubezov D.A., Lukanin R.V., Krotkov A.R., Ogoreltsev A.Y., Serebryansky P.V., Yudina E.A. Laser ablation for pilonidal disease. Koloproktologia. 2020; 19(2): 91–103 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-2-91-103

14. Nir Horesh, Hila Meiri, Roi Anteby, Edward Ram. Outcomes of Laser-Assisted Closure (SiLaC) Surgery for Chronic Pilonidal Sinus Disease. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. March 2023; 33(2). DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0567

15. Zolotukhin D., Krochek I., Sergiyko S. Changes in temperature fi elds and microcirculation in the walls of pilonidal cysts of the coccygeal region during and after laser-induced thermotherapy. Baikal Medical Journal. 2022; 1(1): 41–49 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.57256/2949-0715-2022-1-41-49.


Review

For citations:


Cherepenin M.Yu., Lutkov I.V., Gorsky V.A. Modern methods for treating pilonidal disease: a comparative study. Laser Medicine. 2024;28(2):34-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37895/2071-8004-2024-28-2-34-40

Views: 98


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8004 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8644 (Online)